[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707231419.13182.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:19:12 -0400
From: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Greg Ungerer" <gerg@...pgear.com>,
"Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>, bryan.wu@...log.com
Subject: Re: early_printk accessing __log_buf
On Sun 22 Jul 2007 19:50, Mike Frysinger pondered:
>
> i think the attached two functions account for what Robin and Andrew
> were thinking ...
A note about why/when grab_lock would be set to zero (pre-kernel init, or
OOPs) might be nice.
Or - remove it - and tell people they should be using do_syslog interface in
a "normal" kernel environment (where log_end or log_start can be updated).
Either would be fine with me. Andrew?
-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists