linux-kernel - Re: Git tree for old kernels from before the current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707231250390.3607@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git tree for old kernels from before the current tree

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> 
> What is missing is:
> 
>  - v0.02 sources

I think this really is gone. 0.03 was such an improvement on 0.02 that I 
think what happened was that I literally removed 0.02 (hey, it wasn't 
historically interesting at the time!). It's not the first time people 
have wondered about it.

0.03 was the first version where you could actually do things under Linux, 
and I think I could compile etc. I *think* it was released pretty close 
after 0.02, which made 0.02 appear even more flawed and a brown-paper-bag 
release.

>  - v0.10 announcement

Hmm. That one would be interesting, since the reason for the 0.03->0.10 
jump was that I was getting so happy with how it was actually working for 
me (ie able to compile itself under itself). But I don't see it, and it's 
not on google in the comp.os.minix archives either, afaik.

>  - v0.96 sources

Hmm. Odd. Might be another case of "0.96a was released as a 
brown-paper-bag fix for 0.96, and the latter hidden in shame".

Stupid bugs only appear endearing in retrospect.

>  - v0.99.12 announcement

Well, the 0.99.12 announcement is found by google.

	http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.announce/browse_thread/thread/8a19289f68a4af35/fe433c9df4b382a5?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#fe433c9df4b382a5

In general, google groups (search by date and author, and make the group 
be something like *linux*) is good, I found the above on the first try.

>  - sources for v0.99.13{abcdefghij} (got k, don't know where the serie 
>    ends) as well as announcements for all of them
> 
>  - all announcements for v0.99.14{a-z} except for pl14r
> 
>  - announcements for pl15c to pl15j, 1.0-pre1, and ALPHA-1.0.

Many of those might not have merited announcements. At some point I was 
just making tar-balls a few days apart, to let people track it.

> Otherwise the archive appears fairly complete with almost 3 years of 
> Linux development history captured in a 3MB pack file.

Heh, nice. Those early versions are all smaller than the patch set we 
generate in a day these days :)

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/