[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070723203858.GA18569@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:38:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@...bc.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT-Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22.1-rt4 lockups
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> It looks like sched_class->enqueue_task() is NULL and that's why the
> system hangs ..
>
> The reason why that happens is because check_pgt_cache() is called
> from the idle thread, and with PREEMPT_RT check_pgt_cache() locks at
> least one mutex .. Once the idle thread is on a wait_list, as soon as
> it's woke by the mutex owner the system will crash in enqueue_task.
> Since the idle thread has a NULL sched_class->enqueue_task ..
>
> check_pgt_cache() is already getting called from the desched_thread()
> , so I think it could just be removed from i386 cpu_idle().
>
> Anyone have comments on the theory above?
yeah, that call definitely looks wrong in cpu_idle(). Most of the other
check_pgd_cache() calls introduced by commit f1d1a842 look wrong too in
an -rt context. Fix is below.
Ingo
Index: linux-rt.q/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.q.orig/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
+++ linux-rt.q/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick();
- check_pgt_cache();
rmb();
idle = pm_idle;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists