linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuset aware writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707231452290.32152@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Ethan Solomita <solo@...gle.com>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] cpuset aware writeback

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:

> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:23:14 -0700
> > Ethan Solomita <solo@...gle.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> These patches are mostly unchanged from Chris Lameter's original
> >> changelist posted previously to linux-mm.
> > 
> > Thanks for keeping these patches up to date. Add you signoff if you
> > did modifications to a patch. Also include the description of the tests
> > in the introduction to the patchset.
> 
> 	So switch from an Ack to a signed-off? OK, and I'll add descriptions of

No. Do a signed-off if you have modified the patch.

> testing. Everyone other than you has been silent on these patches. Does
> silence equal consent?

Sometimes. Howerver, the audience for NUMA and cpusets is rather limited.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/