[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707231810.32983.lenb@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:10:32 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Joachim Deguara" <joachim.deguara@....com>,
"lkml List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
travis@....com, steiner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] faking and fixing the NUMA SLIT
On Monday 23 July 2007 16:25, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:42:20 +0200
> Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > Don't think that is really useful.
>
> I think this is useful for NUMA debugging since one may use this to
> create various slit configuration that can be useful to simulate many
> fallback scenarios that may require testing.
Why not build a new SLIT into the kernel for the test
to override the BIOS -- like we do when we want a test version of the DSDT?
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists