[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A534EA.6030008@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:08:26 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> This version brings a number of new checks, and a number of bug
> fixes. Of note:
>
> - warnings for multiple assignments per line
This is bugged. e.g. the following line will hit this exception check:
int i = some_function(a, b, c);
> - warnings for multiple declarations per line
> - checks for single statement blocks with braces
>
> This patch includes an update for feature-removal-schedule.txt to
> better target checks.
>
> Andy Whitcroft (12):
> check for single statement braced blocks
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
> ---
>
> +# check for redundant bracing round if etc
> + if ($line =~ /\b(if|while|for|else)\b/) {
> + # Locate the end of the opening statement.
> + my @control = ctx_statement($linenr, $realcnt, 0);
> + my $nr = $linenr + (scalar(@control) - 1);
> + my $cnt = $realcnt - (scalar(@control) - 1);
> +
> + my $off = $realcnt - $cnt;
> + #print "$off: line<$line>end<" . $lines[$nr - 1] . ">\n";
> +
> + # If this is is a braced statement group check it
> + if ($lines[$nr - 1] =~ /{\s*$/) {
> + my ($lvl, @block) = ctx_block_level($nr, $cnt);
> +
> + my $stmt = join(' ', @block);
> + $stmt =~ s/^[^{]*{//;
> + $stmt =~ s/}[^}]*$//;
> +
> + #print "block<" . join(' ', @block) . "><" . scalar(@block) . ">\n";
> + #print "stmt<$stmt>\n\n";
> +
> + # Count the ;'s if there is fewer than two
> + # then there can only be one statement,
> + # if there is a brace inside we cannot
> + # trivially detect if its one statement.
> + # Also nested if's often require braces to
> + # disambiguate the else binding so shhh there.
> + my @semi = ($stmt =~ /;/g);
> + ##print "semi<" . scalar(@semi) . ">\n";
> + if ($lvl == 0 && scalar(@semi) < 2 &&
> + $stmt !~ /{/ && $stmt !~ /\bif\b/) {
> + my $herectx = "$here\n" . join("\n", @control, @block[1 .. $#block]) . "\n";
> + shift(@block);
> + ERROR("braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks\n" . $herectx);
This is a royal pain, since it now throws an ERROR for the obviously preferable
piece of code below:
if (err) {
do_something();
return -ERR;
} else {
do_somthing_else();
}
Also, CondingStyle explicitly permits this style (even encourages it):
---
Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
if (condition)
action();
This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single
statement. Use braces in both branches.
if (condition) {
do_this();
do_that();
} else {
otherwise();
}
---
So, IMO this test needs to go, unless the script becomes smart enough to know
that either side of the else requires braces. It's definately not an ERROR.
Cheers,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists