[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070723062759.GB3933@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:27:59 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alan Modra <amodra@...pond.net.au>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "build-id" changes break sparc64
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:13:21PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Roland McGrath writes:
>
> > It turns out the problem here is that some .o files wind up with their own
> > .note.gnu.build-id sections. I got the makefile magic wrong, thinking that
> > LDFLAGS_MODULE was a variable specifically for .ko links. It's also used
> > in cmd_link_multi-m.
>
> Alan Modra (binutils hacker) has said to me in the past that using
> ld -r to combine the objects in each directory is bad; he would much
> rather that we gave all the individual objects to the final link,
> since that enables ld to do better optimizations on some targets. We
> could actually do that quite easily by making the built-in.o files be
> linker scripts listing the individual objects rather than creating
> them with ld -r.
Should be doable without to much pain.
Alan can you please share with us exactly why this is better and what we may
run into of problems doing so.
A sample script would be nice too....
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists