[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A44CD0.8020508@l4x.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:38:08 +0200
From: Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1
Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
>> Paul Mundt wrote:
>>> It's known that empty objects require explicit tuning for the ABI,
>>> however, this has never been anything that was fatal. If you flip
>>> something on within each of those subsystems, does the error go away?
>> Yes, thanks this fixes it. Would you accept a patch to modify the
>> defconfig so that it builds by default? Would be most useful for
>> my pet project (http://l4x.org/k/). A fixed toolchain would of course
>> also be nice.
>>
> I'll certainly apply patches that help getting it building, so feel free
> to send updates for that. As I also noted, the empty object thing is
> non-fatal with my toolchain, so I'd also appreciate it if you could put
> a tarball of yours up somewhere so this is a bit easier to verify. I
> suspect this is just something we're going to have to change in binutils,
> however.
You can find it here:
http://l4x.org/~jdittmer/sh64-linux-binutils-2.17-gcc-4.1.3pre.tar.bz2
binutils 2.17.50.0.17 (from ftp.kernel.org)
gcc 4.1.3 prerelease (svn, fixes a build bug for sh64)
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists