[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18084.21578.171810.48265@notabene.brown>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:10:02 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH 0/2] stripe-queue for 2.6.23 consideration
On Sunday July 22, dan.j.williams@...el.com wrote:
> Andrew, Neil,
>
> The stripe-queue patches are showing solid performance improvement.
>
> git://lost.foo-projects.org/~dwillia2/git/iop md-for-linus
>
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 1484 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> include/linux/raid/raid5.h | 87 +++-
> 2 files changed, 1164 insertions(+), 407 deletions(-)
>
> Dan Williams (2):
> raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests (take2)
> raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests (take4)
>
> I initially considered them 2.6.24 material but after fixing the sync+io
> data corruption regression, fixing the large 'stripe_cache_size' values
> performance regression, and seeing how well it performed on my IA
> platform I would like them to be considered for 2.6.23. That being said
> I have not yet tested expand operations or raid6.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think we really shouldn't aim for 2.6.23 at this stage. The merge
window is shut, and this is a little more that a bug fix. It's sounds
great though. I'd really like to hear more success reports, and will
do my own review a testing either this week or next.
Certainly good for -mm.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists