[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707240007100.3128@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add __GFP_ZERO to GFP_LEVEL_MASK
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Then we can either fixup the slab allocators to mask out __GFP_ZERO, or
> do something like the below.
>
> Personally I like the consistency of adding __GFP_ZERO here (removes
> this odd exception) and just masking it in the sl[aou]b thingies.
There is another exception for __GFP_DMA.
> Anybody else got a preference?
> #define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((__force gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1))
>
> -/* if you forget to add the bitmask here kernel will crash, period */
> +/*
> + * If you forget to add the bitmask here kernel will crash, period!
> + *
> + * GFP_LEVEL_MASK is used to filter out the flags that are to be passed to the
> + * page allocator.
> + *
GFP_LEVEL_MASK is also used in mm/vmalloc.c. We need a definition that
goes beyond slab allocators.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists