linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A5C105.20707@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:06:13 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...e.de,
	clameter@....com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	greg@...ah.com, hch@...radead.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default
 v2

On 7/23/2007 10:23 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> this one already in -mm, but it needs [PATCH 1/10]
> 
> [PATCH 3/10] try parent numa_node at first before using default v2
[...]
> this patch is using second method.
[...]

Could you shorten the patch description?

Don't describe what your patch _does not_ do.  Don't even describe _how_
your patch does what it does (unless it's obfuscated, but then that
would be a bad patch anyway).

Just describe _why_ it does something.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/