linux-kernel - Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A5C461.7030806@free.fr>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:20:33 +0200
From:	John Sigler <linux.kernel@...e.fr>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies

John Sigler wrote:

> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 271 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 275 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 290 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 297 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 345 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 358 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 384 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 392 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 395 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 396 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1031 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1100 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1105 us user-latency.
> ( check_dektec_in-1095 |#0): new 1106 us user-latency.
> 
> Here's the function trace for the 1106-µs latency:
> 
> http://linux.kernel.free.fr/latency/1106-us-trace.txt

The function trace for 400-µs latencies is different:

( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 275 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 276 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 288 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 289 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 289 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 290 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 297 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 345 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 354 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 377 us user-latency.
( check_dektec_in-1145 |#0): new 393 us user-latency.

http://linux.kernel.free.fr/latency/393-us-trace.txt

There are ~200 calls to ioread32 from mdio_read from speedo_timer.

http://lxr.linux.no/source/drivers/net/eepro100.c#L1159
http://lxr.linux.no/source/drivers/net/eepro100.c#L928

In this case, and as far as I understand, the culprit is the eepro100
driver talking to one of the NICs (which one?). Is that correct?

What is the consequence of IRQ10 being shared by eth2 and
by my I/O board?

How can I force Linux to assign different IRQs to every peripheral
if I have free IRQs lines?

Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/