linux-kernel - Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:44:33 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"Agarwal, Lomesh" <lomesh.agarwal@...el.com>
Cc:	nigel@...pend2.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?

On Tuesday, 24 July 2007 00:18, Agarwal, Lomesh wrote:
> The net effect would be same. Why would you choose one over other
> (do_sys_poll vs. do_poll)?

The last patch is simpler and it doesn't involve the try_to_freeze() thing.

> Can you point me to code where socket read returns in case of
> signal_pending? I need to try couple of things.

I need to find it myself, first. ;-)

Greetings,
Rafael

-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/