[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070724152018.GA31729@Krystal>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:20:18 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
jbeulich@...ell.com, zach@...are.com, patches@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/11] x86: Fix alternatives and kprobes to remap write-protected kernel text
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@...p.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > Good catch. I also still wonder why alternative (except alternative smp,
> > which is ok) and paravirt patching functions are not marked __init. I really
> > hope they are never used when NMI, MCE are enabled or when threads may
> > have been preempted in the site being patched, or it could result in an
> > illegal instruction.
> >
>
> We need to patch modules at load time. Presumably an NMI/MCE handler
> will not depend on code in a being-loaded module.
>
> J
>
Oh yes, I see. That's ok since the code of a being-loaded module is not
executed yet.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists