linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A631A1.6080002@shadowen.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:06:41 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jul 23 2007 16:36, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> this somehow seems to match something completely non-related (a function
>> pointer declaration case):
>>
>> ERROR: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
>> #7278: FILE: drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h:434:
>> +       bool (*check_mng_mode)(struct e1000_hw *);
>>
>> even if I put a space between ")(", it still complains.
> 
> [assumed] majority of kernel code uses ")(" instead of ")\s+(",
> so the warning seems bogus. And it even gets nitpicky.

Yep, thats just a false positive.  Will sort it out.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/