linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707241228291.3607@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Marcin ??lusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>,
	Jean-Baptiste Vignaud <vignaud@...dmail.fr>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	shemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-net <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time



On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> please try the patch below instead.

I'm hoping this is just a "let's see if the behavior changes" patch, not 
something that you think should be applied if it fixes something?

This patch looks like it is trying to paper over (rather than fix) some 
possible bug in the "->disable" logic. Makes sense as a "let's see if it's 
that" kind of thing, but not as a "let's fix it".

Or am I missing something?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/