[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070723205535.d08338fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:55:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] readahead: combine
file_ra_state.prev_index/prev_offset into prev_pos
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:00:12 +0800 Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
> @@ -342,11 +342,9 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
> bool hit_readahead_marker, pgoff_t offset,
> unsigned long req_size)
> {
> - int max; /* max readahead pages */
> - int sequential;
> -
> - max = ra->ra_pages;
> - sequential = (offset - ra->prev_index <= 1UL) || (req_size > max);
> + int max = ra->ra_pages; /* max readahead pages */
> + pgoff_t prev_offset;
> + int sequential;
>
> /*
> * It's the expected callback offset, assume sequential access.
> @@ -360,6 +358,9 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
> goto readit;
> }
>
> + prev_offset = ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> + sequential = offset - prev_offset <= 1UL || req_size > max;
It's a bit pointless using an opaque type for prev_offset here, and then
encoding the knowledge that it is implemented as "unsigned long".
It's a minor thing, but perhaps just "<= 1" would make more sense here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists