linux-kernel - Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:13:49 +0200
From:	Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	honza@...os.cz, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

On 07-07-24 15:45 H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> >Okay, I tested with Fedora on x86_64 and it worked there too.
> >(Not that that proves much.)
> >
> >Did you capture any of the error messages, like the address
> >of the segfault?
> >
> 
> FWIW, on x86-64, this should show up in dmesg.
> 
> 	-hpa

Guys, this is at boot time and most of the binaries don't work.
However at the end busybox is called and then there is a shell,
where I can call the binaries and force the segmentation
violation. Pencil and paper work usually. But right now I don't
have the broken kernel anymore and it's 1 am here. Wait for
tomorrow.

-- 
Uli Kunitz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/