[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070725085204.GA22067@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:52:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > apparently the functionality of the soft lockup watchdog was never
> > actually tested with that patch applied ...
> >
> > [this is -stable material too.]
>
> Still isn't working. I'm getting random meaningless softlockup
> trippings coming out for no apparent reason.
hm, you still havent applied the other 4 patches i sent:
softlockup-fix.patch
softlockup-add-irq-regs-h.patch
softlockup-better-printout.patch
softlockup-cleanups.patch
softlockup-use-cpu-clock.patch
they are all necessary.
softlockup-use-cpu-clock.patch could easily solve the present problem
you have: as i pointed it out it is _wrong_ to use sched_clock(),
because sched_clock() is not a reliable clocksource. Especially on your
VAIO.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists