[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185360414.5439.335.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:46:53 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: reduce pagetable-freeing latencies
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 12:26 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Plan is fixed array or 4 or maybe 8 entries (pointers), that shouldn't
> > be -too- bad. The code path I'm a bit worried about is
>
> Yep.
>
> > unmap_mapping_ranges() which goes into zapping page tables from deep
> > within filesystems.
>
> Your aim is to conserve stack space?
> The worst case has to work without overflow anyways, so using VLAs don't
> help you. Just allocate the largest size you can safely afford.
>
> This is also easier to test; if it is too large it is better when
> the overflow triggers always.
>
> They are more useful in user space with larger stacks when you don't
> know the maximum size.
In fact, i discussed with peter and I think the best is to only have one
entry in the stack mmu_gather structure. If we fail to allocate a page
to batch entries, we flush that one and steal it :-) Then we have a page
to gather more.
I'll give that a go tomorrow, I got delayed by some stupid HW issues
today.
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists