[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A6D775.4030802@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:54:13 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] i386: bitops: Kill volatile-casting of memory addresses
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>Besides, as Nick pointed out, it prevents some valid optimizations.
>
>
> No it doesn't. Not the ones on the functions that just do an inline asm.
>
> The only valid optimization it might break is for "constant_test_bit()",
> which isn't even using inline asm.
The constant case is probably most used (at least for page flags), and
is most important for me. constant_test_bit may not be using inline asm,
but the volatile pointer target means that it reloads the value and can't
do much optimisation over it.
BTW. once volatile goes away, i386 really should start using the C
versions of __set_bit and __clear_bit as well IMO. (at least for the
constant bitnr case), so gcc can potentially optimise better.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists