[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185398148.3162.5.camel@tongli.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:15:48 -0700
From: "Li, Tong N" <tong.n.li@...el.com>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:55 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >> the 3s is the problem: change that to 60s! We no way want to
> >> over-migrate for SMP fairness, the change i did gives us reasonable
> >> long-term SMP fairness without the need for high-rate rebalancing.
> >
> > Actually, I do have requirements from our engineering guys for
> > short-term fairness. They'd actually like decent fairness over even
> > shorter intervals...1 second would be nice, 2 is acceptable.
> >
> > They are willing to trade off random peak performance for predictability.
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
> The sysctls for CFS have nanosecond resolution. They default to
> millisecond-order values, but you can set them much lower. See sched_fair.c for
> the knobs and their explanations.
>
> -- Chris
This is incorrect. Those knobs control local-CPU fairness granularity
but have no control over fairness across CPUs.
I'll do some benchmarking as Ingo suggested.
tong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists