| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b21f8390707242319gb17e4c9h274635b4c7fc1801@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:19:19 +1000 From: "Matthew Hawkins" <darthmdh@...il.com> To: "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> Cc: "Eric St-Laurent" <ericstl34@...patico.ca>, "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...il.com> Subject: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 On 7/25/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote: > Not to say that neither fix some problems, but for such conceptually > big changes, it should take a little more effort than a constructed test > case and no consideration of the alternatives to get it merged. Swap Prefetch has existed since September 5, 2005. Please Nick, enlighten us all with your "alternatives" which have been offered (in practical, not theoretical form) in the past 23 months, along with their non-constructed benchmarks proving their case and the hordes of happy users and kernel developers who have tested them out the wazoo and given their backing. Or just take a nice steaming jug of STFU. -- Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists