[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070726023401.f6a2fbdf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:34:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:20:25 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Once we give the kernel the knowledge that the dentry wont be used again
> by this app, the kernel can do a lot more intelligent decision and not
> baloon the dentry cache.
>
> ( we _do_ want to baloon the dentry cache otherwise - for things like
> "find" - having a fast VFS is important. But known-use-once things
> like the daily updatedb job can clearly be annotated properly. )
Mutter. /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure has been there for what, three
years? Are any distros raising it during the updatedb run yet?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists