linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix build for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070726195148F.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:51:48 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	bzolnier@...il.com
Cc:	lethal@...ux-sh.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix build for CONFIG_BLOCK=n

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix build for CONFIG_BLOCK=n
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:04:56 +0200

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > BLK_DEV_BSG was added outside of the if BLOCK check, which allows it to
> > be enabled when CONFIG_BLOCK=n. This leads to many screenlengths of
> > errors, starting with a parse error on the request_queue_t definition.
> > Obviously this wasn't intended for CONFIG_BLOCK=n usage, so just move the
> > option back in to the block.
> > 
> > Caught with a randconfig on sh.
> 
> also pointed out in my bsg review from a week ago ;)
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/17/487

Oops, sorry.


> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> 
> Thanks for fixing this up.

Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/