[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070726145952.GK27237@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:59:52 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:23:30PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> That would just save reading the directories. Not sure
> it helps that much. Much better would be actually if it didn't stat the
> individual files (and force their dentries/inodes in). I bet it does that to
> find out if they are directories or not. But in a modern system it could just
> check the type in the dirent on file systems that support
> that and not do a stat. Then you would get much less dentries/inodes.
FWIW, find(1) does *not* stat non-directories (and neither would this
approach). So it's just dentries for directories and you can't realistically
skip those. OK, you could - if you had banned cross-directory rename
for directories and propagated "dirty since last look" towards root (note
that it would be a boolean, not a timestamp). Then we could skip unchanged
subtrees completely...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists