lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:24:45 +0530 From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> To: Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@...jp.nec.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, k-miyoshi@...jp.nec.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> Subject: Re: [patch] add kdump_after_notifier On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:47:18PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> [2007-07-26 17:44]: > > > > > > Of course, but that's why the patch doesn't change this by default but > > > gives the user the choice. > > > > > > > What value will distro set it to by default? > > 0. > > > Can we be more specific in terms of functionality and code that exactly > > what we are trying to do after panic? > > Well, KDB, but now everybody answers with “not mainline -- doesn't > count”. > That's true. Its not mainline. We had similar discussion in the past also. I think we should allow only audited code to be run after panic(). Leaving it open to modules or unaudited code makes this solution something like LKCD where whole lot of code used to run after the crash, hence was unreliable. If KDB goes mainline, then I think it is not a bad idea to call debugger first (if it is enabled) and then one can trigger crash dump from inside the debugger. Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists