[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070727010825.a5934cb0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:08:25 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte on ia64 take3
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:13:52 +0200
Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net> wrote:
> I can agree:
> - lazy_mmu_prot_update() is not the right place for a flush
> - to flush I-cache before inserting PTE (at least for the
> machines with physical address tagged caches)
>
> Can we have a separate, specific exec_flush_phtag_icache_page()
> that is to be called before inserting a PTE with the exec bit on
> for physical address tagged I-caches) ?
> It is defined in asm-generic/cacheflush.h as NO-OP.
>
> Or exec_flush_icache_page_before_set_pte() ?
>
Thank you for advise. Hmm..how about this ?
==
/*
* synchronize icache and dcache if the hardware doesn't do it automatically
* and the page is executable.
*/
static inline arch_sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pte, page) {
}
==
Anyway, I understand your point. Thanks!
Regards,
- Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists