[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185472136.20910.15.camel@dchapman.boston.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:48:56 -0400
From: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, vtaras@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix build failure on fs/quota.c
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:15 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> Fix ia64 build failure on fs/qutoa.c. A recent patch used the
> type compat_u64 which on ia64 is only available if CONFIG_COMPAT
> is defined.
>
>
> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>
>
> --
>
> --- a/fs/quota.c
> +++ b/fs/quota.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_quotactl(unsigned int cmd, const char __user *special, qid_t
> return ret;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || (defined(CONFIG_IA64) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT))
> /*
> * This code works only for 32 bit quota tools over 64 bit OS (x86_64, ia64)
> * and is necessary due to alignment problems.
>
>
I see that this patch has not been pulled in yet. I am wondering if I
confused things by sending it to both linux-kernel and linux-ia64 lists
and each expected the other to pull it in? Sorry if that breaks the
process, I am somewhat new to submitting patches.
Can we see about getting this in? It will break the build used by
fedora/RHEL for certain and I expect other distro's as well.
thanks,
- Doug
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists