linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	david@...g.hm
cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
> 
> how about the fact that Linus found the problem becouse his system didn't work
> right?

No, it works, it just forces me to use a configuration that I'm not 
personally interested in on that particular machine.

I tend to like using minimal kernels. I don't use modules on most of my 
machines, and I actually look over my config. Maybe I'm odd. But I think 
it's a good thing to let people decide what they want (and what they do 
_not_ want) in their kernels.

I think forcing people to use CPU_HOTPLUG is a mistake. There's a reason 
that existed as a config option. The ACPI changes basically mean that the 
whole CPU_HOTPLUG config option is totally pointless, because everybody is 
forced to have it.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/