[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707262117.26353.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:17:25 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)
On Thursday, 26 July 2007 19:45, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs
> > > of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option.
> >
> > Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> > and STR?
>
> CONFIG_STR doesn't exist.
Hmm, perhaps we should introduce a CONFIG_SUSPEND and change
CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND into CONFIG_HIBERNATION, both depending on
CONFIG_PM?
There's quite some code needed only for suspend compiled in when CONFIG_PM is
set ...
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists