lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:52:38 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com> To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver) Hello. Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >>>driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now >>>that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the >>>perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same >>>doubt, just wanted to double-check. So, why do we now need a new legacy >>>(a/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c) driver when a "modern" driver >>>exists? >>We don't *need* it but some people still want to use old IDE and the >>author was willing to make it neatly compatible so that anything that >>works with the pata_platform should be able to use the ide_platform >>driver and vice versa. For the shorter term that can only be a good thing >>- arch code doesn't need to care about which driver is used, end users >>can pick and it doesn't end up adding new ties between code and old IDE. > Ok, thanks for the explanation Alan. So, there's no technical argument, > just "being nice to the users", and add a new driver, which we know we'll > have to remove soon, thus having to persuade its users, who by that time Define "soon". :-) > will get used to it and will not want to invest money into switching to > another one... Invest into what if the drivers are functionally identical? > Thanks > Guennadi MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists