[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0707262156250.6614@poirot.grange>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:13:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver)
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > Ok, thanks for the explanation Alan. So, there's no technical argument,
> > just "being nice to the users", and add a new driver, which we know we'll
> > have to remove soon, thus having to persuade its users, who by that time
>
> Define "soon". :-)
"Soon" in this case means, we NOW have a replacement driver and we aim at
deprecating the IDE driver in its favour.
> > will get used to it and will not want to invest money into switching to
> > another one...
>
> Invest into what if the drivers are functionally identical?
For example, into porting user space (replace hdx with sdx). And even
switching to a "functionally identical" driver requires a new complete
testing cycle... No, I won't be in that situation, so, it's not my money
I'm worrying about. But I know there are companies for whom releasing a
new version of /etc/fstab is a considerable expense... Not that I cared
about them anyway.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists