[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070726213154.GA26569@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:31:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tong Li <tong.n.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS
* Tong Li <tong.n.li@...el.com> wrote:
> > you need to measure it over longer periods of time. Its not worth
> > balancing for such a thing in any high-frequency manner. (we'd trash
> > the cache constantly migrating tasks back and forth.)
>
> I have some data below, but before that, I'd like to say, at the same
> load balancing rate, my proposed approach would allow us to have
> fairness on the order of seconds. I'm less concerned about trashing
> the cache. The important thing is to have a knob that allow users to
> trade off fairness and performance based on their needs. [...]
such a knob already exists to a certain degree, but i havent tested its
full effects on SMP fairness yet. If you pull my scheduler tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
and if you enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, then all the sched-domain
parameters become runtime tunable under /proc/sys/cpu*.
Could you try to increase the cross-CPU rebalancing frequency and see
how it impacts the precision of your measurement? Tune 'min_interval'
and 'max_interval' down to increase the frequency of rebalancing.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists