[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A9ACB2.9030302@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:28:34 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Andika Triwidada <andika@...il.com>,
Robert Deaton <false.hopes@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: updatedb
On 07/27/2007 09:54 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 08:00 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> The remaining issue of updatedb unnecessarily blowing away VFS caches is
>> being discussed (*) in a few thread-branches still running.
>
> If you solve that, the swap thing dies too, they're one and the same
> problem.
I still wonder what the "the swap thing" is though. People just kept saying
that swap-prefetch helped which would seem to indicate their problem didnt
have anything to do with updatedb.
Also, I know shit about the VFS so this may well be not very educated but to
me something like FADV_NOREUSE on a dirfd sounds like a much more promising
approach than the convoluted userspace schemes being discussed, if only
because it'll actually be implemented/used.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists