[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707270944.LAA17140@ifs.emn.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:44:25 +0200 (MEST)
From: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
To: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: starvik@...s.com, dev-etrax@...s.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/cris
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
Cc: starvik@...s.com
Cc: dev-etrax@...s.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
---
fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
index 8672ab7..d5b1e3d 100644
--- a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ find_fixup_code(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
- if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) != 0) {
+ if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) != NULL) {
/* Adjust the instruction pointer in the stackframe. */
instruction_pointer(regs) = fixup->fixup;
arch_fixup(regs);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists