[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707270945.LAA17250@ifs.emn.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:45:05 +0200 (MEST)
From: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
To: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: matthew@....cx, grundler@...isc-linux.org, kyle@...isc-linux.org,
parisc-linux@...isc-linux.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/parisc
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
Cc: matthew@....cx
Cc: grundler@...isc-linux.org
Cc: kyle@...isc-linux.org
Cc: parisc-linux@...isc-linux.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
---
smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
index 04c7e1d..16fccbe 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ smp_call_function (void (*func) (void *i
if (retry) {
spin_lock (&lock);
- while (smp_call_function_data != 0)
+ while (smp_call_function_data != NULL)
barrier();
}
else {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists