linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lkd29mk9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:18:46 +0200
From:	Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv

David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> writes:

> Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
>> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
>
> Can you make them of style:
>
> 	if (!x)

Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that
transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x)
so I don't know. I think that transformation 
some 0 to NULL is less controversial.


>
> instead?
>
> Thanks,
> David

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/