[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707271418390.12711@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:18:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm
On Jul 27 2007 16:07, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>On 7/27/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> wrote:
>> On Jul 27 2007 10:59, Al Viro wrote:
>> >On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
>> >> buf = alloc_safe_buffer(device_info, ptr, size, dir);
>> >> - if (buf == 0) {
>> >> + if (buf == NULL) {
>> >
>> > if (!buf)
>> >surely...
>>
>> Makes it look like it's used as a bool.
>
>bool variables are rarely named buf, so no.
Whatever. Java is good in one point: the ! operator requires a bool.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists