[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A93C2B.4080902@kite.se>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:28:27 +0200
From: Magnus Naeslund <mag@...e.se>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
CC: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, "david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Al Boldi wrote:
>
> Thanks for asking. I'm rather surprised why nobody's noticing any of this
> slowdown. To be fair, it's not really a regression, on the contrary, 2.4 is
> lot worse wrt swapin and swapout, and Rik van Riel even considers a 50%
> swapin slowdown wrt swapout something like better than expected (see thread
> '[RFC] kswapd: Kernel Swapper performance'). He probably meant random
> swapin, which seems to offer a 4x slowdown.
>
Sorry for the late reply.
Well I think I reported this or another swap/tmpfs performance issue earlier ( http://marc.info/?t=116542915700004&r=1&w=2 ), we got the suggestion to increase /proc/sys/vm/page-cluster to 5, but we never came around to try it.
Maybe this was the reason for my report to be almost entirely ignored, sorry for that.
Regards,
Magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists