[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185550256.3203.77.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:30:56 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kzak@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com,
lucho@...kov.net, zippel@...ux-m68k.org, hpa@...or.com,
rathamahata@...4.ru, dhowells@...hat.com, sfrench@...ba.org,
mhalcrow@...ibm.com, phillip@...lewell.homeip.net,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
wli@...omorphy.com, shaggy@...tin.ibm.com, vandrove@...cvut.cz,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, aia21@...tab.net,
mark.fasheh@...cle.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu,
dushistov@...l.ru, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, arnd@...db.de,
holzheu@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: request for patches: showing mount options
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 15:45 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> [please consider pruning the CC list if discussing some aspect, which
> doesn't concern all]
>
> I've done an audit of all filesystems with regards to showing mount
> options in /proc/<pid>/mounts. Unfortunately most of them show none
> or only a part of all accepted options (for details see list of
> filesystems at the end of the mail).
>
> This is currently not a big problem, because mount(8) stores the given
> options in /etc/mtab. However we want to get rid of mtab, and this
> requires, that the option showing be fixed up.
>
> It would be easiest if this was done by the VFS instead of having to
> deal with it in filesystems. However there are differences in how
> filesytems handle options during mount and remount, and it would be
> impossible to take this into account in all cases.
>
> If you are CC-ed, and responsible for one of these filesystems, please
> take a moment to fully implement the ->show_options() method. In most
> cases it should be an easy task.
>
> If for some reason you are unable to do this, please let me know and
> I'll fix it up.
>
> Here are some guidelines for showing options. I'll also add these to
> Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
>
> + If a filesystem accepts mount options, it must define show_options()
> + to show all the currently active options. The rules are:
> +
> + - options MUST be shown which are not default or their values differ
> + from the default
> +
> + - options MAY be shown which are enabled by default or have their
> + default value
> +
> + Options used only internally between a mount helper and the kernel
> + (such as file descriptors), or which only have an effect during the
> + mounting (such as ones controlling the creation of a journal) are exempt
> + from the above rules.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
> -------
> legend:
>
> all - fs has options, but doesn't define ->show_options()
> some - fs defines ->show_options(), but some options are not shown
> noopt - fs does not have options
> good - fs shows all options
> patch - I have a patch
>
>
> 9p some
> adfs all (maintainer?)
> affs all
> afs all
> autofs all
I'm not sure I understand this.
How does autofs show it's options without a ->show_options method?
> autofs4 some
OK, uid and gid aren't shown.
That should be straight forward to fix.
What's your time frame for this?
Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists