linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/um

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:35:41 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/um

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:45:56AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.

ACK

>  sys-i386/fault.c   |    2 +-
>  sys-x86_64/fault.c |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Except you should probably diff from the top of the kernel tree.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/