[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46AA2748.80703@howardsilvan.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:11:36 -0700
From: Lee Howard <faxguy@...ardsilvan.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
CC: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, rmk@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serial flow control appears broken
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>
>
>>If the application were to use TIOCM_RTS how would it know when to apply it or
>>not? Is there some approach that the application could take to manage flow
>>control on the serial port? What about software flow control? Does the
>>
>>
>
> Well, an application could negate RTS when it receives a character and
>is running out of resources for further processing of incoming data.
>
> Smarter UARTs may be able to negate RTS themselves based on the amount of
>data in their receive FIFO. The threshold may be configurable.
>
Okay, so let's say we've got a loop around a blocking read on the modem
file descriptor...
for (;;) {
read some data from modem
process data from modem
if (end-of-data detected) break;
}
Are you suggesting that the application should be using deasserting RTS
after the read and asserting it before?
I had previously thought that the control of RTS was something that the
serial/tty driver was supposed to do independently based on the buffer
fill. Was I wrong?
Thanks,
Lee.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists