linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3r6mt4u7q.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:44:41 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces.

Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> Perhaps, but
>      1. Existing kernel style uses braces with single-statement
>         do-while.
>      2. Linus prefers (or at least preferred in October of 2006) braces
>         with single-statement do-while.

Fine with me, but it should IMHO be maintainer's call.

Things which a) are clearly better, and/or b) would require massive
reformatting when new maintainer steps in, should be documented
in CodingStyle and perhaps checked for by scripts and sparse.

Other things... sometimes there are multiple ways to do something
well, and humans aren't, and shouldn't be that deterministic.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/