[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070727105343.6486c74a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:53:43 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use relevant mailing lists
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:31:40 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:08:57 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > + Use the relevant mailing list(s) -- don't just send everything to
> > + lkml (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org).
>
> True.
>
> I personally only troll lkml for unloved patches, so I suspect that a
> random patch which is sent to mailing-list-A and not to lkml has a higher
> probability of getting lost than one which is sent to both lists. Plus
> it'd be nice to get lkml's patch-to-noise ratio above one percent.
Yes (to P-N ratio).
I'd really like to see netdev patches going to netdev (only :)
and SCSI patches to linux-scsi (only), e.g., unless they actually
address some linux-arch like issue(s).
However, those maintainers are quite different regarding patch
handling. Maybe you could try to address some of that at that
Cambridge/September event.
> So I'd suggest that you rework the text here to make it clearer that
> patches should go to lkml _and_ to the subsystem-specific mailing list.
Patch is withdrawn.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists