[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185561966.23486.1.camel@x2.microgate.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:46:06 -0500
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Lee Howard <faxguy@...ardsilvan.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serial flow control appears broken
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 12:22 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > The TTY line discipline driver could do that based on the amount of
> > received data present in its buffer. And it should if asked to (a brief
> > look at drivers/char/n_tty.c reveals it does; obviously there may be a bug
>
> Really, where? In my look through the code I haven't found any mechanism
> that would result in RTS being lowered based on TTY buffers filling up,
> at least not in the 8250 case.
serial_core.c:uart_throttle()
serial_core.c:uart_unthrottle()
These are called by N_TTY in response to buffer levels.
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists