[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185562330.2642.13.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:52:10 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces.
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:05:16 -0700
> Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > Sparse warnings... I think it shouldn't complain either, unless
> > > called with extra parameter.
> >
> > Good point; Sparse shouldn't warn about this by default. I've turned
> > that off in latest Sparse from Git, so you need to give -Wdo-while or
> > -Wall to get warnings about that. However, the kernel gives -Wall, so
> > you'll still see the warnings there.
>
> I believe reeducating sparse was the best fix here. I think I'll now
> have a quiet accident with codingstyle-proscribe-do-while-without-braces.patch
I didn't just submit the patch because Sparse warns about it. I
submitted the patch because of the coding style preference that led to
the Sparse warning.
Also, if this really *shouldn't* form part of the kernel style, then the
kernel should use -Wno-do-while with -Wall, or should stop using -Wall.
That said, I don't care all that much about the patch, so I won't push
further for it one way or another.
- Josh Triplett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists