[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070727121930.30779cad.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:19:30 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk, andi@...stfloor.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, ray-lk@...rabbit.org,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, ck@....kolivas.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans
for 2.6.23]
Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, I really wonder how much pain could be avoided if updatedb recorded
> mtime of directories and checked it.
Someone mentioned a variant of slocate above that they called mlocate,
and that Red Hat ships, that seems to do this (if I understand you and
what mlocate does correctly.)
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists