linux-kernel - Re: Source organization for two drivers sharing coomon code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707272131270.16356@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:34:16 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
cc:	Subbu Seetharaman <subbus@...verengines.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Source organization for two drivers sharing coomon code


On Jul 27 2007 13:12, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jul 27 2007 10:17, Subbu Seetharaman wrote:
>> 
>> >What is the recommended way for two drivers to share common code ?
>> ><snip>...The source code for these dirvers will fit under drivers/net and
>> >drivers/scsi.  But both drivers share some common code.
>
>> You could create (in total) three modules, e.g. my-common.ko,
>> my-net.ko and my-scsi.ko, of which the latter two use functions from the
>> first.
>
> Where would the common code live, in such a case?  Would you just pick one of
> the two locations at random, or put it in drivers/misc or maybe lib?

Perhaps drivers/message - well I can't answer that exactly.

As far as the output object files are concerned, it is not relevant,
since they will be autoloaded anyway :)



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/