[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46AA4CEA.7070400@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:52:10 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Char: moxa, fix and optimise empty timer
Andrew Morton napsal(a):
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:29 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> moxa, fix and optimise empty timer
>>
>> don't wait and delete empty timer in empty timer function. Also fire next
>> empty timer at rounded jiffies to save power.
>>
>
> What is actually being "fixed" here?
Lockup (see below).
>> ---
>> commit da52793b6347e8b6b048526ce2422e29b20bb335
>> tree ad0bee78e45beef89dc740f81e0606d782296542
>> parent 3a69b463dcad1ff142f46e8fb74e7dc5a092eb60
>> author Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:42:49 +0200
>> committer Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:42:49 +0200
>>
>> drivers/char/moxa.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/moxa.c b/drivers/char/moxa.c
>> index ed76f0a..5000b3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/moxa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/moxa.c
>> @@ -1040,14 +1040,14 @@ static void check_xmit_empty(unsigned long data)
>> struct moxa_port *ch;
>>
>> ch = (struct moxa_port *) data;
>> - del_timer_sync(&moxa_ports[ch->port].emptyTimer);
It's "wait until the code below me is finished". At least the _sync is buggy.
>> if (ch->tty && (ch->statusflags & EMPTYWAIT)) {
>> if (MoxaPortTxQueue(ch->port) == 0) {
>> ch->statusflags &= ~EMPTYWAIT;
>> tty_wakeup(ch->tty);
>> return;
>> }
>> - mod_timer(&moxa_ports[ch->port].emptyTimer, jiffies + HZ);
>> + mod_timer(&moxa_ports[ch->port].emptyTimer,
>> + round_jiffies(jiffies + HZ));
>> } else
>> ch->statusflags &= ~EMPTYWAIT;
>> }
>
> A call to check_xmit_empty() used to guarantee that the timer was no longer
> running (if the first `if' succeeds and the second does not), but that is
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it guaranteed nothing. When the timer function is
called (note, that check_xmit_empty is timer.function), timer base lock is held
and there is no window to schedule the timer again when its function is running.
> no longer the case. You're sure this is correct?
I still think so.
thanks,
--
Jiri Slaby (jirislaby@...il.com)
Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists